I got quite annoyed by another thread that has appeared in the forum yesterday(which was closed), I feel like the thread opener is "plain wrong", especially when he literally said that these fan arts are literally "child pornography".
What determine an image to be considered "sexual"?
Personally, and correct me if I am missing something, there are only a few traits to look at:
- Dress(or lack thereof)
Is the subject wearing something questionable? revealing? is it missing any clothing parts?
- View Angle
Is the image portrayed in such a viewing angle to give emphasis to certain parts of the subject's body? like for example, is the image a straight up view of a character's under skirt?
- Pose and expression
Is the subject presented in a way to suggest any sexual feelings? is it placing his limbs in a way to highlight certain parts of it's body? is it's pose trying to focus the viewer attention on certain body parts?
- Actions
Is the subject doing something considered sexual? like XXX or YYY ? is another character in the scene touching the subject inappropriately?
- Setting and Items
Is there anything around the subject that's suggesting something kinky going on? any items that look "inappropriate" ?
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
With this in mind, let's see and judge if any of the loading screens meet any of the criteria I just mentioned:

Dress:Nope
View:Nope
Pose:Nope
Action:Nope
Setting:Nope

Dress:Nope
View:Nope
Pose:Nope
Action:Nope
Setting:Nope

Dress:Maybeee you can consider that top a bit revealing but it's nothing you don't see normally in the "real world"
View:Nope
Pose:Nope
Action:Nope
Setting:Nope

Dress:Nope
View:Nope
Pose:Nope
Action:Nope
Setting:Nope

Dress:Nope
View:Maybe some angles may be considered suggesting, but this wallpaper isn't really focused on any character specifically, and with this many characters on screen it's not unusual that one or two may be in a view angle that, if focused(a.k.a. if you literally ignore everything else), may hint to a slightly sensual theme
Pose:Nope
Action:Nope
Setting:Nope

eh

Dress:Nope
View:That may be considered to be an "inspiring" view, too bad I am not talking about the elin but the castanic so nobody cares.
Pose:As above
Action:Nope
Setting:Nope

Dress:That looks like the Maritime Sukumitzu (not sure abut the spelling here), an in-game costume that consist in an one-piece blue swimsuit with a wet-looking semi-transparent sailor-like shirt on top of it. A wet and semi transparent shirt would normally be an erotic detail if wasn't that below the shirt there's a non-transparent swimsuit so...dunno about you but for me it's pretty meaningless in this instance.
View:
A frontal view mostly highlighting the subject's face,while all the rest is behind; a leg is even slightly out of focus, I don't see anything there.
Pose:
Looks like the normal pose of someone reading a book on a...grassy beach? well either way, the pose doesn't suggest anything to me.
Action:Reading a book may be erotic to some people nobody.
Setting:I like the watermelon slices ~

Dress:
This looks like a 2013 swimsuit for elin that includes a rubber duck ring. The bikini isn't particularly slim in any part and in this image there's no "thinning" of it so it looks like a regular, real-world like bikini.
View:Nope
Pose:
The blushing may be interpreted in a certain way, but there are other reasons why someone may be blushing, so, it's questionable at best. The head slightly resting on hand doesn't necessarily mean anything, it's a pretty neutral pose.
Action:Nope
Setting:Nope
Rating of this image by the "Experts" of popular anime image boards that includes explicit loli anime pics:
Danbooru (can't post the link due to the nature of the site):

Gelbooru(even if the uploader is Danbooru the mods of Gelbooru can freely asset the rating):

So yeah, it considered "Safe" even by the expert(the other 2 ratings are "Questionable" and "Explicit")

Dress:
This swimsuit looks like the "White Stockings Mallot" from Tera, it doesn't have a seductive design by any capacity tho I always wondered what the heck of a swimsuit includes stockings. This particular costume is even "safer" than the previous bikini as it doesn't really expose any parts "X" parts of the body, in real world scenario nobody will bat an eye if you were to wear such costume(in a beach obviously).
View:Nope
Pose:
The pose and the blushing may slightly suggest a romantic vibe within the picture. But If I were to classify this in that spectrum I'd put it in an "very weak" category.
Action:
The "V" sign usually stands for "Victory" or "Peace" and it's intended to be a generic positive sign with no particular connotations outside that.
Setting:Nope
Now, if someone still see anything sexual in this image, he can contact me and I'll kindly share with him some links to actual hentai sites where the "actual" hentai / pornographic stuff is, because if you think this is anywhere near "child pornography" as the user in the other thread said, I think you've lived in a basement or something, have you ever went to a beach? have you seen even what preteen people wear ?
TL; DR
If you see anything sexual or inappropriate in these screens I fear you're just projecting your own insecurities, go look at what the real "loli hentai" looks like kk thx bai.


